Smith v Bailey [2014] EWHC 2569 (QB) (28 July 2014)
The Master was correct to reject contributory negligence due to lack of evidence and to include accommodation costs in the interim payment, as there was a high degree of confidence the trial judge would award a capital sum for accommodation needs; the Defendant failed to adduce evidence to the contrary.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 2569
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Melvyn Smith; Defendant/appellant: Richard Bailey
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Appeal / Appeal From Interim Payment Order
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Interim Payments, Contributory Negligence, Accommodation Costs, Damages Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Melvyn Smith
Claimant/respondent
Richard Bailey
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Appeal / Appeal From Interim Payment Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether contributory negligence should reduce interim payment
- 2 Whether accommodation costs should be included in interim payment assessment
Ratio Decidendi
The Master was correct to reject contributory negligence due to lack of evidence and to include accommodation costs in the interim payment, as there was a high degree of confidence the trial judge would award a capital sum for accommodation needs; the Defendant failed to adduce evidence to the contrary.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Interim payment order of £500,000 to Claimant upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment