Atkins v Co-Operative Group Ltd [2016] EWHC 80 (QB) (26 January 2016)

Atkins v Co-Operative Group Ltd [2016] EWHC 80 (QB) (26 January 2016)

The fresh medical evidence (Dr Peebles' report and Dr Limbrey's addendum) could not have been obtained with reasonable diligence before judgment and is pivotal to determining the existence of a compensable condition. The appeal is allowed; judgment is varied to reflect that only breach of duty is admitted, with causation and quantum to be assessed, and the interim payment issue is reserved for trial.

Citation
[2016] EWHC 80 (QB)
Parties
Claimant/respondent: Desmond Atkins; Defendant/appellant: Co-operative Group Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 January 2016
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal Against Order of Master Gidden Dated 25 March 2015
Outcome
Appeal allowed; order of Master Gidden varied.
Legal Topics
Interim Payments, Medical Evidence, Setting Aside Judgment, Admissibility of Fresh Evidence
Personal Injury Civil Procedure Interim Payments Medical Evidence Setting Aside Judgment Admissibility of Fresh Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Desmond Atkins

Claimant/respondent

Co-operative Group Ltd

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Appeal Against Order of Master Gidden Dated 25 March 2015

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether fresh medical evidence should be admitted on appeal
  2. 2 Whether judgment should be varied to reflect issues of causation and quantum
  3. 3 Whether interim payment order should be reserved pending trial outcome

Ratio Decidendi

The fresh medical evidence (Dr Peebles' report and Dr Limbrey's addendum) could not have been obtained with reasonable diligence before judgment and is pivotal to determining the existence of a compensable condition. The appeal is allowed; judgment is varied to reflect that only breach of duty is admitted, with causation and quantum to be assessed, and the interim payment issue is reserved for trial.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; order of Master Gidden varied.

Orders

  • Judgment for the Claimant on breach of duty, with causation and quantum to be assessed.
  • Issue of repayment of interim payment reserved to be addressed at conclusion of trial on causation and quantum.