Al-Mishlab v Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2015] EWHC 3096 (QB) (30 September 2015)
The application for interim relief is refused because the Applicant's concerns about procedural unfairness can be addressed by the internal panel, which is obliged to act fairly and flexibly. The process is not shown to be systemically unfair at this stage, and the Applicant has a right of appeal if dissatisfied. The court should not pre-emptively interfere with internal disciplinary proceedings absent evidence of material unfairness or serious irregularity.
- Citation
- [2015] EWHC 3096
- Parties
- Applicant/claimant: Mr. Talib Al-Mishlab; Respondent/defendant: Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Interim Relief (injunction) in Employment Dispute / Ex Tempore Judgment on Application for Interim Relief Prior to Internal Disciplinary Hearing
- Outcome
- Application for interim relief refused
- Legal Topics
- Interim Relief, Disciplinary Procedures, Contractual Fairness, NHS Employment, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr. Talib Al-Mishlab
Applicant/claimant
Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Interim Relief (injunction) in Employment Dispute / Ex Tempore Judgment on Application for Interim Relief Prior to Internal Disciplinary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Trust's decision to proceed with a capability hearing breaches the Applicant's contract of employment
- 2 Whether the procedures adopted by the Trust are unfair and contrary to the 'Maintaining High Professional Standards in the Modern NHS' (MHPS) framework
- 3 Whether the court should grant interim relief to restrain the internal disciplinary hearing
Ratio Decidendi
The application for interim relief is refused because the Applicant's concerns about procedural unfairness can be addressed by the internal panel, which is obliged to act fairly and flexibly. The process is not shown to be systemically unfair at this stage, and the Applicant has a right of appeal if dissatisfied. The court should not pre-emptively interfere with internal disciplinary proceedings absent evidence of material unfairness or serious irregularity.
Court Disposition
Application for interim relief refused
Orders
- No injunction granted; internal disciplinary hearing may proceed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment