Costain Ltd & Ors v Bechtel Ltd & Anor [2005] EWHC 1018 (TCC) (20th May 2005)
Although CORBER established that there are serious questions to be tried regarding the project manager's duty of impartiality and possible breach, the balance of convenience does not favour granting an interim injunction because contractual remedies are adequate, damages would suffice, and the proposed injunctions would be difficult to supervise and affect third parties.
- Citation
- [2005] EWHC 1018 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Costain Limited; Claimant/applicant: O’Rourke Civil Engineering Limited; Claimant/applicant: Bachy Soletanche Limited; Claimant/applicant: Emcor Drake & Scull Group PLC; Defendant/respondent: Bechtel Limited; Defendant/respondent: Mr Fady Bassily
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Interim Injunctions / Interlocutory (application for Interim Relief)
- Outcome
- Application for interim injunction refused
- Legal Topics
- Interim Injunctions, Duties of Certifiers/project Managers, Implied Terms of Impartiality, Procuring Breach of Contract, Remedies for Breach, Dispute Resolution Procedures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Costain Limited
Claimant/applicant
O’Rourke Civil Engineering Limited
Claimant/applicant
Bachy Soletanche Limited
Claimant/applicant
Emcor Drake & Scull Group PLC
Claimant/applicant
Bechtel Limited
Defendant/respondent
Mr Fady Bassily
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Interim Injunctions / Interlocutory (application for Interim Relief)
Legal Issues
- 1 What instructions did Mr Bassily give Bechtel staff at the 15 April meeting?
- 2 Is RLE obliged to act impartially as project manager under contract C105, or in the employer's interests?
- 3 Has RLE breached its duty as project manager?
Ratio Decidendi
Although CORBER established that there are serious questions to be tried regarding the project manager's duty of impartiality and possible breach, the balance of convenience does not favour granting an interim injunction because contractual remedies are adequate, damages would suffice, and the proposed injunctions would be difficult to supervise and affect third parties.
Court Disposition
Application for interim injunction refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment