X & Y v Persons Unknown [2006] EWHC 2783 (QB) (08 November 2006)

X & Y v Persons Unknown [2006] EWHC 2783 (QB) (08 November 2006)

The claimants are entitled to an interim injunction restraining publication of specific confidential information about their marital difficulties by persons unknown, as their Article 8 rights are engaged and outweigh Article 10 rights in the circumstances. The injunction should be narrowed by reference to a confidential schedule, include a public domain proviso, and best endeavours should be used to notify or serve potential defendants. The non-disclosure by the claimants was not material or intentional so as to justify discharge of the injunction.

Citation
[2006] EWHC 2783
Parties
Claimants: X & Y; Defendants: THE PERSON OR PERSONS who have offered and/or provided to the publishers of the Mail on Sunday, Mirror and Sun newspapers information about the status of the Claimants' marriage; Third Parties (applicants to Discharge Injunction): MGN Limited and News Group Newspapers Limited; Third Party (applicant to Vary Order): Associated Newspapers Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 November 2006
Procedural Posture
Interim Injunction (privacy/confidence) / Application to Discharge or Vary Ex Parte Injunction
Outcome
Interim injunction continued with modifications
Legal Topics
Interim Injunctions, Article 8 ECHR (right to Privacy), Article 10 ECHR (freedom of Expression), John Doe Injunctions, Confidential Information, Non Disclosure Obligations, Public Domain Proviso, Spycatcher Principle
Privacy Law Media Law Human Rights Interim Injunctions Article 8 ECHR (right to Privacy) Article 10 ECHR (freedom of Expression) John Doe Injunctions Confidential Information +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 23 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

X & Y

Claimants

THE PERSON OR PERSONS who have offered and/or provided to the publishers of the Mail on Sunday, Mirror and Sun newspapers information about the status of the Claimants' marriage

Defendants

MGN Limited and News Group Newspapers Limited

Third Parties (applicants to Discharge Injunction)

Associated Newspapers Limited

Third Party (applicant to Vary Order)

Procedural Posture

Interim Injunction (privacy/confidence) / Application to Discharge or Vary Ex Parte Injunction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimants are entitled to an interim injunction restraining publication of information about their marriage by persons unknown
  2. 2 Whether Article 8 ECHR rights are engaged and outweigh Article 10 rights in the circumstances
  3. 3 Whether the injunction should be discharged for material non-disclosure

Ratio Decidendi

The claimants are entitled to an interim injunction restraining publication of specific confidential information about their marital difficulties by persons unknown, as their Article 8 rights are engaged and outweigh Article 10 rights in the circumstances. The injunction should be narrowed by reference to a confidential schedule, include a public domain proviso, and best endeavours should be used to notify or serve potential defendants. The non-disclosure by the claimants was not material or intentional so as to justify discharge of the injunction.

Court Disposition

Interim injunction continued with modifications

Orders

  • Injunction continued on narrower terms, with a confidential schedule specifying protected information.
  • Order to include a public domain proviso.