Pritpal Singh Gill v (1) Anami Holdings Limited (2) Clark Hill Limited

Pritpal Singh Gill v (1) Anami Holdings Limited (2) Clark Hill Limited

The sale of the property by Enilo and subsequent transactions were in breach of the stay order. Granting an injunction and joining the proposed additional defendants is necessary to prevent frustration of the court's order and preserve the status quo until the return date.

Parties
Claimant: Pritpal Singh Gill; Defendant/respondent: Anami Holdings Limited; Defendant/respondent: Clark Hill Limited; Proposed Additional Defendant/respondent: Enilo International Limited; Proposed Additional Defendant/respondent: Vitality Estates Limited; Proposed Additional Defendant/respondent: Proprio Investments Limited; Proposed Additional Defendant/respondent: Pananveer Bachra
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
25 January 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interim Injunction Application in Ongoing Proceedings
Outcome
Interim injunction granted; proposed additional defendants joined to proceedings
Legal Topics
Interim Injunctions, Enforcement of Consent Orders, Stay of Proceedings, Breach of Court Orders
Civil Procedure Property Law Interim Injunctions Enforcement of Consent Orders Stay of Proceedings Breach of Court Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pritpal Singh Gill

Claimant

Anami Holdings Limited

Defendant/respondent

Clark Hill Limited

Defendant/respondent

Enilo International Limited

Proposed Additional Defendant/respondent

Vitality Estates Limited

Proposed Additional Defendant/respondent

Proprio Investments Limited

Proposed Additional Defendant/respondent

Pananveer Bachra

Proposed Additional Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interim Injunction Application in Ongoing Proceedings

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sale of the claimant's family home was in breach of a court-ordered stay on enforcement
  2. 2 Whether an interim injunction should be granted to prevent further sale or disposal of the property
  3. 3 Whether proposed additional defendants should be joined to the proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The sale of the property by Enilo and subsequent transactions were in breach of the stay order. Granting an injunction and joining the proposed additional defendants is necessary to prevent frustration of the court's order and preserve the status quo until the return date.

Court Disposition

Interim injunction granted; proposed additional defendants joined to proceedings

Orders

  • Proposed additional defendants are added as parties to the proceedings.
  • An interim injunction is granted restraining any sale or disposal of the property until the return date.