Miss World Ltd. v Channel Four Television Corporation
The use of 'Mr Miss World' is at least arguably an infringement of the claimant's trade marks under sections 10(1), 10(2), and 10(3) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 and the Community Trade Mark Regulation, as it takes unfair advantage of and is detrimental to the distinctive character and repute of the 'Miss World' mark. The claimant has a sufficiently strong case to justify interim injunctive relief, and the balance of convenience favours granting the injunction. Article 10 ECHR does not preclude the grant of an injunction in these circumstances.
- Parties
- Applicant/proposed Claimant: Miss World Limited; Respondent/proposed Defendant: Channel Four Television Corporation
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Intellectual Property (trade Mark) Interim Application / Application for Interim Injunction
- Outcome
- Interim injunction granted
- Legal Topics
- Interim Injunctions, Trade Mark Infringement, Freedom of Expression, Balance of Convenience
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Miss World Limited
Applicant/proposed Claimant
Channel Four Television Corporation
Respondent/proposed Defendant
Procedural Posture
Intellectual Property (trade Mark) Interim Application / Application for Interim Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the use of 'Mr Miss World' infringes the claimant's registered trade marks under sections 10(1), 10(2), and 10(3) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 and corresponding Community Trade Mark Regulation provisions
- 2 Whether the balance of convenience favours granting an interim injunction
- 3 Whether Article 10 ECHR (freedom of expression) precludes interim relief
Ratio Decidendi
The use of 'Mr Miss World' is at least arguably an infringement of the claimant's trade marks under sections 10(1), 10(2), and 10(3) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 and the Community Trade Mark Regulation, as it takes unfair advantage of and is detrimental to the distinctive character and repute of the 'Miss World' mark. The claimant has a sufficiently strong case to justify interim injunctive relief, and the balance of convenience favours granting the injunction. Article 10 ECHR does not preclude the grant of an injunction in these circumstances.
Court Disposition
Interim injunction granted
Orders
- Channel Four Television Corporation is restrained from broadcasting or otherwise publishing the programme under the title 'Mr Miss World' or using the words 'Miss World' in connection with the programme pending trial or further order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment