TA Gwillim & Sons, R (on the application of) v The Welsh Ministers

TA Gwillim & Sons, R (on the application of) v The Welsh Ministers

An adverse effect on production under Article 40(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1782/2003 includes situations where agri-environmental commitments prevent or restrict an increase in production, not solely where there is a reduction; the claimant's production was adversely affected during the reference period, justifying substitution of the earlier period for calculation of payment entitlements.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: The Queen (on the application of TA Gwillim and Sons); Defendants/appellants: The Welsh Ministers
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 October 2010
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Interpretation of Council Regulation (ec) No. 1782/2003, Single Payment Scheme, Hardship Provisions, Agri Environmental Commitments

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Queen (on the application of TA Gwillim and Sons)

Claimant/respondent

The Welsh Ministers

Defendants/appellants

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Appeal

  1. 1 Whether 'production was adversely affected' under Article 40(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1782/2003 requires a dip in production or includes prevention/restriction of an increase in production
  2. 2 Whether land area should be considered in determining adverse effect on production
  3. 3 Whether agri-environmental commitments during the reference period entitle substitution of a different period for calculation of reference amount

Ratio Decidendi

An adverse effect on production under Article 40(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1782/2003 includes situations where agri-environmental commitments prevent or restrict an increase in production, not solely where there is a reduction; the claimant's production was adversely affected during the reference period, justifying substitution of the earlier period for calculation of payment entitlements.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Defendants' decision of 2 September 2008 quashed
  • Defendants to take a fresh decision on the claimant’s application for substitution of the period 1997-1999 for the reference period 2000-2002