Perriam Ltd v Wayne & Anor
Clause 4.2 of the Deed of Variation operated as an immediate waiver and release of the tenant's and guarantors' liability for the condition of the windows from the date of the Deed (24 April 2007), providing a complete defence to the dilapidations claim in respect of the windows. The absence of a saving for antecedent breach and the commercial context supported this interpretation. The costs of the preliminary issues should be costs in the case, and the security for costs should be returned to court.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Perriam Limited; Defendant/appellant: Mr Nicholas Wayne; Defendant/appellant: Mr Martin Daly
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Preliminary Issues and Costs Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Deeds, Guarantor Liability, Repairing Covenants, Waiver and Release, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Perriam Limited
Claimant/respondent
Mr Nicholas Wayne
Defendant/appellant
Mr Martin Daly
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Preliminary Issues and Costs Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether clause 4.2 of the Deed of Variation operated as an immediate waiver or release of liability for the condition of the windows
- 2 Whether the appellants, as guarantors, had a continuing liability for dilapidations relating to the windows after the Deed of Variation
- 3 Whether the costs of the preliminary issues should be awarded to the claimant or be costs in the case
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 4.2 of the Deed of Variation operated as an immediate waiver and release of the tenant's and guarantors' liability for the condition of the windows from the date of the Deed (24 April 2007), providing a complete defence to the dilapidations claim in respect of the windows. The absence of a saving for antecedent breach and the commercial context supported this interpretation. The costs of the preliminary issues should be costs in the case, and the security for costs should be returned to court.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Appellants have a complete defence to the dilapidations claim in respect of the windows
- Costs of the preliminary issues to be costs in the case
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment