Bexbes LLP v George & Ors
The Engagement Letter required a consistent, face-value comparison of Consideration under the first offer and the Disposal, including contingent elements at full value and excluding certain fees and payments not assumed by the buyer. The increase in Consideration entitled BexBes to an additional fee calculated as 18% of the increase.
- Parties
- Claimant: BexBes LLP; First Defendant: Michael George Christopher Beer; Second Defendant: Jane Susan Beer
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (contractual Dispute) / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Claimant in part
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Engagement Letters, Calculation of Consideration, Contingent Payments, Professional Fees
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BexBes LLP
Claimant
Michael George Christopher Beer
First Defendant
Jane Susan Beer
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (contractual Dispute) / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 How should 'Consideration' be interpreted under the Engagement Letter for the purposes of calculating BexBes' fee?
- 2 Should contingent elements and performance-related payments be included in the Consideration?
- 3 What is the correct approach to the calculation of Consideration under the first offer and the final Disposal?
Ratio Decidendi
The Engagement Letter required a consistent, face-value comparison of Consideration under the first offer and the Disposal, including contingent elements at full value and excluding certain fees and payments not assumed by the buyer. The increase in Consideration entitled BexBes to an additional fee calculated as 18% of the increase.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Claimant in part
Orders
- BexBes is entitled to an additional fee of £57,780 in addition to the £45,000 already paid.
- BexBes is entitled to interest, to be agreed between the parties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment