Europa Oil And Gas Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities And Local Government & Ors

Europa Oil And Gas Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities And Local Government & Ors

'Mineral extraction' in paragraph 90 of the NPPF includes exploration as well as production. The inspector erred in law by excluding exploration from 'mineral extraction.' The error was material because the inspector's decision might have been different if the correct interpretation had been applied.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: Europa Oil and Gas Limited; First Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Defendant/respondent: Surrey County Council; Third Defendant/appellant: Leith Hill Action Group
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 June 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment Quashing Planning Inspector's Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Interpretation of National Planning Policy Framework, Green Belt Policy, Mineral Extraction, Planning Permission for Exploratory Drilling

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Europa Oil and Gas Limited

Claimant/respondent

Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government

First Defendant/respondent

Surrey County Council

Second Defendant/respondent

Leith Hill Action Group

Third Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment Quashing Planning Inspector's Decision

  1. 1 Whether 'mineral extraction' in paragraph 90 of the NPPF includes exploration as well as production
  2. 2 Whether the inspector's error on interpretation affected the outcome

Ratio Decidendi

'Mineral extraction' in paragraph 90 of the NPPF includes exploration as well as production. The inspector erred in law by excluding exploration from 'mineral extraction.' The error was material because the inspector's decision might have been different if the correct interpretation had been applied.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed. The High Court's decision to quash the inspector's decision stands.