Bewley Homes PLC v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities & Anor [2024] EWHC 1166 (Admin) (16 May 2024)
Paragraph 81 of NPPF 2021 does not mandate that significant weight must be given to the economic benefits of any development proposal; it is a high-level policy objective, and the decision-maker is entitled to assess the nature and degree of economic benefits and assign appropriate weight in the planning balance. The Inspector made no error of law in giving moderate weight to the economic benefits in this case, and was not required to give reasons for departing from previous appeal decisions that misinterpreted the policy.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 1166 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Bewley Homes plc; First Defendant: The Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities; Second Defendant: Waverley Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Statutory Review Under S.288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 / Judgment After Substantive Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of National Planning Policy Framework (nppf) Paragraph 81, Weight to Be Given to Economic Benefits in Planning Decisions, Duty to Give Reasons for Departure From Previous Decisions, Planning Policy and Development Control, Judicial Review of Planning Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bewley Homes plc
Claimant
The Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
First Defendant
Waverley Borough Council
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Statutory Review Under S.288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 / Judgment After Substantive Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether paragraph 81 of NPPF 2021 requires significant weight to be given to economic benefits of any development proposal
- 2 Whether the Inspector erred in law by giving only moderate weight to economic benefits
- 3 Whether the Inspector failed to give reasons for departing from previous appeal decisions interpreting NPPF 81
Ratio Decidendi
Paragraph 81 of NPPF 2021 does not mandate that significant weight must be given to the economic benefits of any development proposal; it is a high-level policy objective, and the decision-maker is entitled to assess the nature and degree of economic benefits and assign appropriate weight in the planning balance. The Inspector made no error of law in giving moderate weight to the economic benefits in this case, and was not required to give reasons for departing from previous appeal decisions that misinterpreted the policy.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Claim for statutory review under s.288 TCPA 1990 is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment