Stena Line Ltd v Merchant Navy Ratings Pension Fund Trustees Ltd & Anor
The Trustee retains the power under clause 30 of the Deed to amend the Scheme to impose deficit repair obligations on Specified Employers. The 2001 Deed and Rules did not permanently release Specified Employers from such obligations, nor did they irrevocably narrow the amendment power. No estoppel by convention arises on the facts to prevent the Trustee from exercising this power. Any future amendment to impose such obligations must be considered in light of consequential amendments to other Scheme rules, but there is no legal bar to such an amendment in principle.
- Parties
- Claimant: Stena Line Limited; First Defendant: Merchant Navy Ratings Pension Fund Trustees Limited; Second Defendant: P&O Ferries Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (pensions/trusts) / Judgment
- Outcome
- Declaratory judgment for Claimant
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Pension Scheme Amendment Powers, Estoppel by Convention, Employer Contribution Obligations, Trustee Discretion, Statutory Funding Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stena Line Limited
Claimant
Merchant Navy Ratings Pension Fund Trustees Limited
First Defendant
P&O Ferries Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (pensions/trusts) / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Trustee retains power to amend the Scheme to impose deficit repair obligations on Specified Employers after the 2001 Deed and Rules
- 2 Whether the Specified Employers are permanently released from further contractual liability for deficit repair
- 3 Whether estoppel by convention prevents the Trustee from imposing such obligations
Ratio Decidendi
The Trustee retains the power under clause 30 of the Deed to amend the Scheme to impose deficit repair obligations on Specified Employers. The 2001 Deed and Rules did not permanently release Specified Employers from such obligations, nor did they irrevocably narrow the amendment power. No estoppel by convention arises on the facts to prevent the Trustee from exercising this power. Any future amendment to impose such obligations must be considered in light of consequential amendments to other Scheme rules, but there is no legal bar to such an amendment in principle.
Court Disposition
Declaratory judgment for Claimant
Orders
- Declaration that the Trustee retains power under clause 30 to amend the Scheme to impose deficit repair obligations on Specified Employers.
- Declaration that the Trustee is not estopped from exercising such power.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment