Midland Expressway Ltd v Carillion Construction Ltd & Ors [2006] EWCA Civ 936 (15 June 2006)
Provisional sums are not payable unless instructed by the employer; actual expenditure replaces provisional sums in the contract price, and the sums are omitted if not used, in accordance with the express provisions of the contract.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 936
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Midland Expressway Limited; Defendants/appellants: Carillion Construction Limited & Ors
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 June 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Queen's Bench Division, Technology & Construction Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Provisional Sums, Contract Price Adjustment, Payment Entitlement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Midland Expressway Limited
Claimant/respondent
Carillion Construction Limited & Ors
Defendants/appellants
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Queen's Bench Division, Technology & Construction Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether provisional sums in the contract are to be omitted and replaced by actual expenditure or paid in addition to actual expenditure
- 2 Proper construction of Clause 36.3 regarding provisional sums
Ratio Decidendi
Provisional sums are not payable unless instructed by the employer; actual expenditure replaces provisional sums in the contract price, and the sums are omitted if not used, in accordance with the express provisions of the contract.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; judgment of Jackson J upheld; provisional sums to be omitted and actual expenditure substituted in contract price.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment