Sattar v Sattar & Anor [2009] EWHC 289 (Ch) (20 February 2009)
Clause 5 of the settlement agreement confers authority on Naeem Sattar to engage corporate advisers on behalf of Strangewood Limited, including agreeing reasonable terms for their engagement, and obliges Bashir Sattar and the Company to provide management information. The loan account should be set to nil as at 6 February 2008, and the £250,000 payment under clause 7 should be treated as a loan to Bashir, not Naeem.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 289 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Naeem Sattar; First Defendant: Bashir Sattar; Second Defendant: Strangewood Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Chancery Division Implementation of Tomlin Order / Post Settlement Applications Under Tomlin Order
- Outcome
- Judgment for Naeem Sattar on all points.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Settlement Agreements, Authority of Agents, Corporate Governance, Loan Account Treatment, Disclosure of Information
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Naeem Sattar
Claimant
Bashir Sattar
First Defendant
Strangewood Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Chancery Division Implementation of Tomlin Order / Post Settlement Applications Under Tomlin Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Naeem Sattar had authority to engage corporate advisers on behalf of Strangewood Limited under the settlement agreement
- 2 Whether Bashir Sattar and Strangewood Limited were obliged to provide management information to Mazars
- 3 Proper accounting treatment of Naeem Sattar's loan account with Strangewood Limited as at 6 February 2008
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 5 of the settlement agreement confers authority on Naeem Sattar to engage corporate advisers on behalf of Strangewood Limited, including agreeing reasonable terms for their engagement, and obliges Bashir Sattar and the Company to provide management information. The loan account should be set to nil as at 6 February 2008, and the £250,000 payment under clause 7 should be treated as a loan to Bashir, not Naeem.
Court Disposition
Judgment for Naeem Sattar on all points.
Orders
- Naeem Sattar has authority to engage Mazars as corporate advisers for Strangewood Limited.
- Bashir Sattar must procure Strangewood Limited to provide all management information requested by Mazars.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment