Harris v Holland & Anor
The SPSA, properly construed, delegates to the agents the authority to advise on sale price, timing, and number of properties to be marketed, and such advice may be given from time to time. The phases in Schedule 4 are not binding except for the immediate sale of Phase 1 properties. Consultation is satisfied by the agents seeking input, regardless of whether a party responds. There is no basis for implying terms contrary to these findings.
- Parties
- Claimant: Anthony Charles Harris; First Defendant: Martin John Holland; Second Defendant: Christchurch Property Company Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Part 8 Claim / Judgment After Expedited Trial
- Outcome
- Claimant's construction of the SPSA upheld; Defendant's construction rejected on all issues; no stay granted.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Settlement Agreements, Dispute Resolution Clauses, Implied Terms, Sale of Partnership Assets
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony Charles Harris
Claimant
Martin John Holland
First Defendant
Christchurch Property Company Ltd
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim / Judgment After Expedited Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Relevant Commercial Sale Price can be altered absent agreement between the parties ('pricing' issue)
- 2 Whether the phases in Schedule 4 bind the parties to sell properties in a particular order ('phasing' issue)
- 3 Whether 'prior consultation' under clauses 12.2 and 12.3 is satisfied if a party fails to respond ('consultation' issue)
Ratio Decidendi
The SPSA, properly construed, delegates to the agents the authority to advise on sale price, timing, and number of properties to be marketed, and such advice may be given from time to time. The phases in Schedule 4 are not binding except for the immediate sale of Phase 1 properties. Consultation is satisfied by the agents seeking input, regardless of whether a party responds. There is no basis for implying terms contrary to these findings.
Court Disposition
Claimant's construction of the SPSA upheld; Defendant's construction rejected on all issues; no stay granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment