Evangelou & Ors v McNicol (Rev 1)
The Labour Party Rule Book gives the NEC power to define precise eligibility criteria for voting in leadership elections, including the ability to impose a retrospective freeze date; the right to vote is not inherent to all members but subject to criteria set by the NEC under the rules.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Christine Evangelou; Claimant/respondent: Rev. Edward Mungo Lear; Claimant/respondent: Hannah Fordham; Claimant/respondent: Chris Granger; Claimant/respondent: FM (a child by his Litigation Friend HW); Defendant/appellant: Iain McNicol (sued as representative of all members of the Labour Party except the Claimants)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 August 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; High Court order set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Unincorporated Association Rules, Voting Rights in Political Parties, Contractual Discretion, Procedural Guidelines
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christine Evangelou
Claimant/respondent
Rev. Edward Mungo Lear
Claimant/respondent
Hannah Fordham
Claimant/respondent
Chris Granger
Claimant/respondent
FM (a child by his Litigation Friend HW)
Claimant/respondent
Iain McNicol (sued as representative of all members of the Labour Party except the Claimants)
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Labour Party NEC had power under the Rule Book to restrict voting eligibility in the leadership election to members with six months continuous membership
- 2 Whether the NEC could impose a retrospective freeze date for voting eligibility
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Party Rule Book gives the NEC power to define precise eligibility criteria for voting in leadership elections, including the ability to impose a retrospective freeze date; the right to vote is not inherent to all members but subject to criteria set by the NEC under the rules.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; High Court order set aside.
Orders
- The judge’s order that his judgment stand as a declaration of the rights of the respondents is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment