Durham Tees Valley Airport Ltd v Bmi Baby Ltd & Anor [2009] EWHC 852 (Ch) (30 April 2009)

Durham Tees Valley Airport Ltd v Bmi Baby Ltd & Anor [2009] EWHC 852 (Ch) (30 April 2009)

On a proper construction of the Base Agreement and the Novation and Variation Agreement, bmibaby was contractually obliged to base and operate two aircraft from DTVA for the agreed term. The agreements were not merely permissive; they imposed binding obligations, and bmibaby's withdrawal constituted a breach of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2009] EWHC 852 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Durham Tees Valley Airport Limited; 1st Defendant: BMI Baby Limited; 2nd Defendant: British Midland Airways Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 April 2009
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute / Judgment on Liability and Limited Factual Issue; Damages to Be Assessed Later
Outcome
Judgment for the claimant on liability; damages to be assessed at a later date.
Legal Topics
Interpretation of Commercial Contracts, Novation and Variation of Agreements, Obligations Under Long Term Commercial Agreements, Damages for Breach of Contract
Contract Law Commercial Law Interpretation of Commercial Contracts Novation and Variation of Agreements Obligations Under Long Term Commercial Agreements Damages for Breach of Contract

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Durham Tees Valley Airport Limited

Claimant

BMI Baby Limited

1st Defendant

British Midland Airways Limited

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Contract Dispute / Judgment on Liability and Limited Factual Issue; Damages to Be Assessed Later

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the agreements imposed a binding obligation on bmibaby to base and operate two aircraft from DTVA for 10 years
  2. 2 Whether bmibaby was contractually entitled to withdraw from DTVA at will
  3. 3 Interpretation of the Base Agreement and Novation and Variation Agreement

Ratio Decidendi

On a proper construction of the Base Agreement and the Novation and Variation Agreement, bmibaby was contractually obliged to base and operate two aircraft from DTVA for the agreed term. The agreements were not merely permissive; they imposed binding obligations, and bmibaby's withdrawal constituted a breach of contract.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant on liability; damages to be assessed at a later date.

Orders

  • Declaration that bmibaby was in breach of contract by withdrawing from DTVA before expiry of the agreed term.
  • Assessment of damages to be determined in subsequent proceedings.