Clerical Medical Investment Group Ltd v Crest Nicholson (South West) Ltd & Ors [2006] EWHC 2481 (TCC) (08 September 2006)
The cooling system is only required to achieve the summer design temperature of 24°C (±2°C) in office areas; the specification does not impose an obligation to design the cooling system to achieve the winter design temperature of 22°C. Designers are entitled to take into account the properties of blinds when sizing chilled beams, as the specification does not limit such consideration. Declarations regarding standard practice or hypothetical future rights are not appropriate.
- Citation
- [2006] EWHC 2481 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: Clerical Medical Investment Group Limited; First Defendant: Crest Nicholson (South West) Limited; Second Defendant: Kier Regional Limited t/a Kier Building; Third Defendant: Hoare Lea and Partners
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 September 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Construction Dispute / Judgment on Declarations
- Outcome
- Declarations granted in part; some declarations refused or to be reworded.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Construction Contracts, Design Obligations, Heating and Cooling Systems, Specification Compliance, Declaratory Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Clerical Medical Investment Group Limited
Claimant
Crest Nicholson (South West) Limited
First Defendant
Kier Regional Limited t/a Kier Building
Second Defendant
Hoare Lea and Partners
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Construction Dispute / Judgment on Declarations
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the cooling system must achieve 22°C in winter or only 24°C in summer
- 2 Whether the designer can take account of blinds when sizing chilled beams
- 3 Whether the specification imposes obligations regarding blinds
Ratio Decidendi
The cooling system is only required to achieve the summer design temperature of 24°C (±2°C) in office areas; the specification does not impose an obligation to design the cooling system to achieve the winter design temperature of 22°C. Designers are entitled to take into account the properties of blinds when sizing chilled beams, as the specification does not limit such consideration. Declarations regarding standard practice or hypothetical future rights are not appropriate.
Court Disposition
Declarations granted in part; some declarations refused or to be reworded.
Orders
- Declaration reflecting true construction of cooling system obligations granted.
- Declaration distinguishing dry resultant design temperatures and control air temperatures to be reworded.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment