Decoma (UK) Ltd v Haden Drysys International Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 1484 (14 November 2005)
The claimant has an arguable case on the interpretation of Articles 11.1, 11.3, and 12.4, and the subsequent events do not render the appeal academic or without practical force. Permission to appeal is therefore granted.
- Citation
- [2005] EWCA Civ 1484
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Decoma (UK) Limited (formerly known as Conix UK Limited); Defendant/respondent: Haden Drysis International Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal From High Court (technology and Construction Court) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Contract Clauses, Limitation of Liability, Remedies for Breach, Termination of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Decoma (UK) Limited (formerly known as Conix UK Limited)
Claimant/applicant
Haden Drysis International Limited
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal From High Court (technology and Construction Court) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a claim under Article 11.1 and Article 11.3 can be brought before the final completion or acceptance date
- 2 Whether claims under Article 11.3 are subject to the cap in Article 12.4
- 3 Whether the cap in the last sentence of Article 12.4 applies if the first cap does not
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant has an arguable case on the interpretation of Articles 11.1, 11.3, and 12.4, and the subsequent events do not render the appeal academic or without practical force. Permission to appeal is therefore granted.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal allowed
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment