JML Direct Ltd v Freesat UK Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 34 (02 February 2010)
Freesat's contractual discretion to allocate EPG channels was subject only to rationality and compliance with the Listing Policy and Ofcom Code; the Code did not require exhaustive publication of all factors, nor did the contract require weight to be given to every criterion. Freesat's reliance on BARB ratings and Freeview listings was rational, and its decision to give no weight to certain factors was permissible. No breach of contract or Code was established.
- Citation
- [2010] EWCA Civ 34
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: JML Direct Ltd; Defendant/respondent: Freesat UK Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 February 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Contract Discretion, Compliance With Regulatory Codes, Allocation of Electronic Programme Guide (epg) Listings, Implied Terms in Commercial Contracts, Fair and Effective Competition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JML Direct Ltd
Claimant/appellant
Freesat UK Ltd
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Freesat breached contract by failing to apply its published method of EPG allocation
- 2 Whether Freesat was required to give weight to all published criteria in EPG allocation
- 3 Whether reliance on factors not expressly published (BARB ratings, Freeview listings) breached the Ofcom Code
Ratio Decidendi
Freesat's contractual discretion to allocate EPG channels was subject only to rationality and compliance with the Listing Policy and Ofcom Code; the Code did not require exhaustive publication of all factors, nor did the contract require weight to be given to every criterion. Freesat's reliance on BARB ratings and Freeview listings was rational, and its decision to give no weight to certain factors was permissible. No breach of contract or Code was established.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment