Powergen Retail Ltd. v British Sugar Plc [2006] EWHC 316 (QB) (27 February 2006)

Powergen Retail Ltd. v British Sugar Plc [2006] EWHC 316 (QB) (27 February 2006)

The SPA did not transfer to Powergen the right to claim undercharges from British Sugar under the expired Supply Agreement because the Supply Agreement was not a 'current contract' at the date of the SPA, and there was no specific or general provision in the SPA that included such contingent or unknown claims.

Citation
[2006] EWHC 316
Parties
Claimant/appellant: Powergen Retail Limited; Defendant/respondent: British Sugar PLC
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
27 February 2006
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Order Striking Out Claim
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Interpretation of Contracts, Assignment of Contractual Rights, Sale of Business Assets
Contract Law Commercial Law Interpretation of Contracts Assignment of Contractual Rights Sale of Business Assets

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Powergen Retail Limited

Claimant/appellant

British Sugar PLC

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Order Striking Out Claim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Sale and Purchase Agreement (SPA) transferred to Powergen the right to claim undercharges from British Sugar under a prior Supply Agreement

Ratio Decidendi

The SPA did not transfer to Powergen the right to claim undercharges from British Sugar under the expired Supply Agreement because the Supply Agreement was not a 'current contract' at the date of the SPA, and there was no specific or general provision in the SPA that included such contingent or unknown claims.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Powergen's appeal is dismissed.