Astor Management AG v Atalaya Mining Plc & Ors [2018] EWCA Civ 2407 (01 November 2018)
The obligation to pay Deferred Consideration under the Master Agreement was not triggered because the express contractual condition precedent—securing a Senior Debt Facility—was not satisfied. Intra-group loans do not qualify as a Senior Debt Facility, and the 'principle of futility' does not override the clear language of the contract. However, the restrictions in clause 6(g)(iv) on distributions and repayments, and the requirement to apply excess cash to Deferred Consideration, remain operative until the Deferred Consideration is paid, even if not yet triggered. Up-tick Payments are not included in the Deferred Consideration for these purposes unless and until their conditions are met.
- Citation
- [2018] EWCA Civ 2407
- Parties
- Appellant (claimant): Astor Management AG (formerly known as MRI Holdings AG); Appellant (claimant): Astor Resources AG (formerly known as MRI Resources AG); Respondent (defendant): Atalaya Mining Plc (formerly known as Emed Mining Public Limited); Respondent (defendant): Atalaya Riotinto Minera SL (formerly known as Emed Tartessus SL); Respondent (defendant): Emed Holdings (UK) Limited; Respondent (defendant): Emed Marketing Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court (commercial Court)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal dismissed; declarations as to construction of clause 6(g)(iv) upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Contracts, Conditions Precedent, Deferred Consideration, Construction of Commercial Agreements, Triggering Events for Payment Obligations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Astor Management AG (formerly known as MRI Holdings AG)
Appellant (claimant)
Astor Resources AG (formerly known as MRI Resources AG)
Appellant (claimant)
Atalaya Mining Plc (formerly known as Emed Mining Public Limited)
Respondent (defendant)
Atalaya Riotinto Minera SL (formerly known as Emed Tartessus SL)
Respondent (defendant)
Emed Holdings (UK) Limited
Respondent (defendant)
Emed Marketing Limited
Respondent (defendant)
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court (commercial Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the obligation to pay Deferred Consideration under the Master Agreement was triggered absent a 'Senior Debt Facility'
- 2 Whether alternative financing (intra-group loans) could satisfy the contractual trigger for payment
- 3 Whether the 'principle of futility' applies to contractual conditions precedent
Ratio Decidendi
The obligation to pay Deferred Consideration under the Master Agreement was not triggered because the express contractual condition precedent—securing a Senior Debt Facility—was not satisfied. Intra-group loans do not qualify as a Senior Debt Facility, and the 'principle of futility' does not override the clear language of the contract. However, the restrictions in clause 6(g)(iv) on distributions and repayments, and the requirement to apply excess cash to Deferred Consideration, remain operative until the Deferred Consideration is paid, even if not yet triggered. Up-tick Payments are not included in the Deferred Consideration for these purposes unless and until their conditions are met.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal dismissed; declarations as to construction of clause 6(g)(iv) upheld.
Orders
- Declaration that EMED Tartessus must not make, declare or pay any dividend or distribution or repay group loans (except as specified) until the Consideration (including Deferred Consideration) is paid in full.
- Declaration that EMED Tartessus must apply any excess cash to pay outstanding amounts of the Consideration (excluding Up-tick Payments) early.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment