African Minerals Ltd v Renaissance Capital Ltd

African Minerals Ltd v Renaissance Capital Ltd

The Court held that 'consummated' in the ATA means completed, i.e., the relevant interest is transferred pursuant to an agreement for a Sale, not merely when the main terms are agreed. Since completion occurred after the relevant period, Renaissance was not entitled to a fee.

Parties
Appellant/defendant: African Minerals Limited; Respondent/claimant: Renaissance Capital Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 May 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed; cross appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Interpretation of Contractual Terms, Fee Entitlement Under Engagement Agreements
Contract Law Commercial Law Interpretation of Contractual Terms Fee Entitlement Under Engagement Agreements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

African Minerals Limited

Appellant/defendant

Renaissance Capital Limited

Respondent/claimant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Shandong Transaction was 'consummated' within the meaning of the amended engagement agreement (ATA)
  2. 2 Whether Renaissance Capital Limited was entitled to a fee under the ATA

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that 'consummated' in the ATA means completed, i.e., the relevant interest is transferred pursuant to an agreement for a Sale, not merely when the main terms are agreed. Since completion occurred after the relevant period, Renaissance was not entitled to a fee.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; cross appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Paragraph 1(a) of the Judge’s order set aside.
  • Renaissance Capital Limited’s cross appeal dismissed.