Hayfin Opal Luxco 3 SARL & Anor v Windermere VII Cmbs Plc & Ors
The definitions of 'Senior Rate' and 'Junior Rate' in the Intercreditor Agreement are clear and unambiguous and cannot be corrected by construction or implication to address the absence of a swap agreement. Default interest and servicing fees are subordinated in the payment waterfall and do not increase Expected Available Interest Collections for the Class X Note. Capitalisation of interest on the Adductor Mortgage Loan properly reduces the amount of Expected Available Interest Collections. Condition 5(i) does not apply to miscalculations or underpayments of the Class X Interest Amount, and no Event of Default arises from any such underpayment. There has been no underpayment of the Class...
- Parties
- Claimant: Hayfin Opal Luxco 3 S.A.R.L.; Claimant: Hayfin Topaz 3 S.C.A.; First Defendant: Windermere VII CMBS plc; Second Defendant: U.S. Bank Trustees Limited; Third Defendant: Elavon Financial Services Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 April 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Part 8 Claim (financial List, Chancery Division, High Court of Justice, England and Wales) / Expedited Trial of Preliminary Issues (final Judgment)
- Outcome
- All issues determined in favour of the Defendants. No underpayment of Class X Interest Amount. No further interest accrues. No Event of Default.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Financial Instruments, Commercial Mortgage Backed Securitisation (cmbs), Priority of Payments, Implied Terms, Default Interest, Capitalisation of Interest, Penalty Clauses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hayfin Opal Luxco 3 S.A.R.L.
Claimant
Hayfin Topaz 3 S.C.A.
Claimant
Windermere VII CMBS plc
First Defendant
U.S. Bank Trustees Limited
Second Defendant
Elavon Financial Services Limited
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim (financial List, Chancery Division, High Court of Justice, England and Wales) / Expedited Trial of Preliminary Issues (final Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the definitions of 'Senior Rate' and 'Junior Rate' in the Intercreditor Agreement should be construed or implied to address the absence of a swap agreement and the calculation of Class X Note payments
- 2 Whether default interest and servicing fees should be included in Expected Available Interest Collections for the Class X Note
- 3 Whether capitalisation of interest on the Adductor Mortgage Loan reduces Expected Available Interest Collections
Ratio Decidendi
The definitions of 'Senior Rate' and 'Junior Rate' in the Intercreditor Agreement are clear and unambiguous and cannot be corrected by construction or implication to address the absence of a swap agreement. Default interest and servicing fees are subordinated in the payment waterfall and do not increase Expected Available Interest Collections for the Class X Note. Capitalisation of interest on the Adductor Mortgage Loan properly reduces the amount of Expected Available Interest Collections. Condition 5(i) does not apply to miscalculations or underpayments of the Class X Interest Amount, and no Event of Default arises from any such underpayment. There has been no underpayment of the Class...
Court Disposition
All issues determined in favour of the Defendants. No underpayment of Class X Interest Amount. No further interest accrues. No Event of Default.
Orders
- Declarations to be agreed by counsel reflecting the judgment that there was no underpayment of the Class X Interest Amount for January 2015 or October 2015, no further interest accrues, and no Event of Default has occurred.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment