IF P & C Insurance Ltd (Publ) v Silversea Cruises Ltd & Ors [2004] EWCA Civ 769 (02 July 2004)
The Court held that the $5 million limit under section Aii of the policy applies to the fleet as a whole, not per vessel. The policy structure, wording, and commercial context supported this interpretation. Claims for loss of income due to passenger cancellations fall under cover Aii, not Ai, as Ai is concerned with physical interference with vessel operations and loss of time, not market losses. The exclusion clause did not preclude recovery under Aii for losses caused by government warnings following 9/11. Rectification was not warranted as there was no clear evidence of a common intention contrary to the written terms.
- Citation
- [2004] EWCA Civ 769
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: IF P & C Insurance Limited (Publ.); Defendant/appellant: Silversea Cruises Limited; Defendant/appellant: Silver Cloud Shipping Company SA; Defendant/appellant: Silver Wind Shipping Company SA; Defendant/appellant: Silversea New Build One Limited; Defendant/appellant: Silversea New Build Two Limited; Defendant/appellant: The Silver Cloud
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 July 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Insurance Dispute (appeal) / Appeal From Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Insurance Policy Limits, Loss of Income Claims, Triggering Events Under Insurance Policies, Rectification of Contract Terms, Application of Deductibles and Limits, Exclusion Clauses in Insurance Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
IF P & C Insurance Limited (Publ.)
Claimant/respondent
Silversea Cruises Limited
Defendant/appellant
Silver Cloud Shipping Company SA
Defendant/appellant
Silver Wind Shipping Company SA
Defendant/appellant
Silversea New Build One Limited
Defendant/appellant
Silversea New Build Two Limited
Defendant/appellant
The Silver Cloud
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Insurance Dispute (appeal) / Appeal From Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the $5 million limit under section Aii of the policy applies per vessel or to the fleet as a whole
- 2 Whether Silversea's claims for loss of income due to passenger cancellations fall under cover Ai or Aii
- 3 Whether the policy should be rectified to clarify the $5 million limit as a fleet or vessel limit
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the $5 million limit under section Aii of the policy applies to the fleet as a whole, not per vessel. The policy structure, wording, and commercial context supported this interpretation. Claims for loss of income due to passenger cancellations fall under cover Aii, not Ai, as Ai is concerned with physical interference with vessel operations and loss of time, not market losses. The exclusion clause did not preclude recovery under Aii for losses caused by government warnings following 9/11. Rectification was not warranted as there was no clear evidence of a common intention contrary to the written terms.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Silversea's claims under covers Ai and B dismissed (except for settled mechanical breakdown claim)
- Silversea entitled to recover $5,000,000 under cover Aii, limited to the fleet as a whole
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment