Entrust Pension Ltd v Prospect Hospice Ltd & Anor [2012] EWHC 1666 (Ch) (18 June 2012)
Under the 1976 and 2005 Scheme rules, the trustee has discretion whether to allocate a share of actuarial surplus to members upon retirement; there is no fixed entitlement to surplus, and the trustee's decision is final and not open to challenge. The trustee must exercise its discretion in accordance with fiduciary duties, but is not obliged to adopt a particular method of computation unless specified. Deferred members' entitlement to surplus is similarly discretionary, and past administration does not create enforceable rights beyond the rules.
- Citation
- [2012] EWHC 1666 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Entrust Pension Limited; 1st Defendant: Prospect Hospice Limited; 2nd Defendant: Yvonne Hunter
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Pension Scheme Construction / Judgment on Split Trial Construction Issues
- Outcome
- Declaratory judgment on construction of Scheme rules; no fixed entitlement to surplus; trustee discretion affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Pension Scheme Rules, Trustee Discretion, Actuarial Surplus, Deferred Member Benefits
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Entrust Pension Limited
Claimant
Prospect Hospice Limited
1st Defendant
Yvonne Hunter
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Pension Scheme Construction / Judgment on Split Trial Construction Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether members are entitled to a share of actuarial surplus under the Scheme rules
- 2 Extent of trustee discretion in awarding surplus
- 3 Methodology for calculating surplus and member shares
Ratio Decidendi
Under the 1976 and 2005 Scheme rules, the trustee has discretion whether to allocate a share of actuarial surplus to members upon retirement; there is no fixed entitlement to surplus, and the trustee's decision is final and not open to challenge. The trustee must exercise its discretion in accordance with fiduciary duties, but is not obliged to adopt a particular method of computation unless specified. Deferred members' entitlement to surplus is similarly discretionary, and past administration does not create enforceable rights beyond the rules.
Court Disposition
Declaratory judgment on construction of Scheme rules; no fixed entitlement to surplus; trustee discretion affirmed.
Orders
- Split trial ordered; factual issues to be determined at subsequent hearing in October 2012.
- Entrust to administer Scheme in accordance with judgment; representation orders for defendants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment