Entrust Pension Ltd v Prospect Hospice Ltd & Anor
The trustee's power to allocate actuarial surplus under the scheme rules is discretionary, not mandatory; the trustee is not obliged to allocate surplus to retiring or deferred members unless it chooses to do so, and the discretion ceases to be exercisable when no actuarial surplus remains. Deferred members' entitlement to consideration for surplus arises at the date of leaving service, but if the trustee fails to exercise its discretion and surplus later lapses, the duty cannot be performed.
- Parties
- Claimant: Entrust Pension Limited; 1st Defendant: Prospect Hospice Limited; 2nd Defendant: Yvonne Hunter
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the employers; trustee's discretion affirmed; no fixed entitlement to surplus for members.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Pension Scheme Rules, Discretionary Powers of Trustees, Actuarial Surplus Allocation, Deferred Pension Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Entrust Pension Limited
Claimant
Prospect Hospice Limited
1st Defendant
Yvonne Hunter
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether trustees have discretion or duty to allocate actuarial surplus to retiring members under scheme rules
- 2 Timing and method of calculation for deferred pension benefits
- 3 Effect of trustee's failure to exercise discretion over surplus
Ratio Decidendi
The trustee's power to allocate actuarial surplus under the scheme rules is discretionary, not mandatory; the trustee is not obliged to allocate surplus to retiring or deferred members unless it chooses to do so, and the discretion ceases to be exercisable when no actuarial surplus remains. Deferred members' entitlement to consideration for surplus arises at the date of leaving service, but if the trustee fails to exercise its discretion and surplus later lapses, the duty cannot be performed.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the employers; trustee's discretion affirmed; no fixed entitlement to surplus for members.
Orders
- Issues 1-5 and 6-10 answered in favour of employers: trustee has discretion over surplus allocation.
- Issue 12 answered in favour of members: deferred pension entitlement arises at leaving service, but surplus allocation subject to trustee discretion.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment