Dacorum Borough Council, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor [2009] EWHC 304 (Admin) (29 January 2009)
The inspector erred in law by failing to consider the explanatory text to Policy 22, which was a material consideration, and by misinterpreting the meaning of 'original dwelling' under the local plan and PPG2. The correct interpretation is that 'original dwelling' refers to the building as it existed on 1 July 1948 or the first dwelling built after that date, not to a replacement building. The inspector's decision to permit the conservatory was therefore unlawful.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 304 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Dacorum Borough Council; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Defendants: Mr and Mrs Alan Hutchinson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (administrative Court) / Judgment on Application to Quash Planning Inspector's Decision; Permission to Appeal Granted
- Outcome
- Application upheld; inspector's decision quashed; permission to appeal granted.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Planning Policy, Green Belt Development, Judicial Review of Planning Decisions, Local Plan Policy Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dacorum Borough Council
Claimant
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
First Defendant
Mr and Mrs Alan Hutchinson
Second Defendants
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (administrative Court) / Judgment on Application to Quash Planning Inspector's Decision; Permission to Appeal Granted
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the planning inspector erred in law in interpreting 'original building' under PPG2 and Local Plan Policy 22 for Green Belt extensions
- 2 Whether the inspector failed to consider the explanatory text to Policy 22 as a material consideration
Ratio Decidendi
The inspector erred in law by failing to consider the explanatory text to Policy 22, which was a material consideration, and by misinterpreting the meaning of 'original dwelling' under the local plan and PPG2. The correct interpretation is that 'original dwelling' refers to the building as it existed on 1 July 1948 or the first dwelling built after that date, not to a replacement building. The inspector's decision to permit the conservatory was therefore unlawful.
Court Disposition
Application upheld; inspector's decision quashed; permission to appeal granted.
Orders
- Inspector's decision permitting the conservatory is quashed.
- Costs of £3,355.83 awarded to the Council against Mr and Mrs Hutchinson.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment