Lonrho Africa (Holdings) Ltd v Norse Air Ltd & Ors

Lonrho Africa (Holdings) Ltd v Norse Air Ltd & Ors

The defendants breached clause 8.1.3 by refusing to provide access to specific categories of documents reasonably required by Lonrho. This justified the service of a clause 8.5 notice and the appointment of forensic accountants at the company's expense. The injunction was properly granted and should be continued against all defendants, including the individual directors, as they controlled access to the documents. Costs were awarded on an indemnity basis due to the defendants' unreasonable and indefensible conduct.

Parties
Claimant: Lonrho Africa (Holdings) Limited; 1st Defendant: Norse Air Limited; 2nd Defendant: Mr. David Avnit; 3rd Defendant: Mrs Nadja Avnit
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 March 2008
Procedural Posture
Commercial Application (injunction) / Interlocutory Application to Continue Injunction and for Costs
Outcome
Application granted. Injunction continued. Costs awarded on indemnity basis.
Legal Topics
Interpretation of Shareholder Agreements, Injunctions, Disclosure Obligations, Costs (indemnity Basis)
Contract Law Company Law Civil Procedure Interpretation of Shareholder Agreements Injunctions Disclosure Obligations Costs (indemnity Basis)

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lonrho Africa (Holdings) Limited

Claimant

Norse Air Limited

1st Defendant

Mr. David Avnit

2nd Defendant

Mrs Nadja Avnit

3rd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Application (injunction) / Interlocutory Application to Continue Injunction and for Costs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendants breached clause 8.1.3 of the share subscription agreement by refusing access to company documents and records
  2. 2 Whether Lonrho was entitled to serve notice under clause 8.5 and appoint forensic accountants at the company's expense
  3. 3 Whether the injunction should be continued against all defendants, including the individual directors

Ratio Decidendi

The defendants breached clause 8.1.3 by refusing to provide access to specific categories of documents reasonably required by Lonrho. This justified the service of a clause 8.5 notice and the appointment of forensic accountants at the company's expense. The injunction was properly granted and should be continued against all defendants, including the individual directors, as they controlled access to the documents. Costs were awarded on an indemnity basis due to the defendants' unreasonable and indefensible conduct.

Court Disposition

Application granted. Injunction continued. Costs awarded on indemnity basis.

Orders

  • The injunction requiring the defendants to provide access to documents and records is continued until trial or further order.
  • The suspension of the injunction is lifted; defendants must comply immediately.