Dellar v Zivy & Ors
The will must be interpreted according to English law, as clearly intended by the Deceased. Under English law, the first defendant is entitled to the shares in SCI du Castillon. No issue arises as to the material or essential validity of the will under French or English law. England is the most appropriate forum for the dispute. Although there was wrongful non-disclosure in the application for permission to serve out of the jurisdiction, it would be contrary to the overriding objective to set aside the order in the circumstances.
- Parties
- Claimant: Howard Dellar; First Defendant: Myriam Zivy; Second Defendant: Gerard Pierre Bertrand Zivy; Third Defendant: Olivia Genevieve Odette Lemarchand; Fourth Defendant: Veronique Roberte Zivy
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 October 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Probate/will Construction / Judgment on Summary Judgment Application and Related Applications
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimant; applications to stay or strike out dismissed; application to set aside permission to serve out of jurisdiction refused.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Wills, Domicile, Jurisdiction, Forum Non Conveniens, Service Out of Jurisdiction, Material Non Disclosure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Howard Dellar
Claimant
Myriam Zivy
First Defendant
Gerard Pierre Bertrand Zivy
Second Defendant
Olivia Genevieve Odette Lemarchand
Third Defendant
Veronique Roberte Zivy
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate/will Construction / Judgment on Summary Judgment Application and Related Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 What law governs the interpretation of the will of Pierre Paul Robert Zivy?
- 2 Does the will entitle the first defendant to the shares in SCI du Castillon?
- 3 Is England the appropriate forum for the dispute?
Ratio Decidendi
The will must be interpreted according to English law, as clearly intended by the Deceased. Under English law, the first defendant is entitled to the shares in SCI du Castillon. No issue arises as to the material or essential validity of the will under French or English law. England is the most appropriate forum for the dispute. Although there was wrongful non-disclosure in the application for permission to serve out of the jurisdiction, it would be contrary to the overriding objective to set aside the order in the circumstances.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimant; applications to stay or strike out dismissed; application to set aside permission to serve out of jurisdiction refused.
Orders
- Declaration that the will is to be interpreted according to English law and the shares in SCI du Castillon (or their proceeds) pass to the first defendant.
- Application to stay or strike out the claim on forum non conveniens grounds dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment