Football Association Premier League Ltd & Ors v QC Leisure (A Trading Name) & Ors
It is desirable to join each applicant as a claimant under CPR 19.2(2)(a) because their participation will assist the court in resolving fundamental law and policy questions in the ECJ reference; any procedural disadvantages to the defendants can be mitigated by conditions on advance notice and oral submissions, and the additional burden or delay is justified by the importance of the issues.
- Parties
- Claimants: Football Association Premier League Limited and Others; Defendants: QC Leisure (A Trading Name) and Others; Applicant to Be Joined as Claimant: Union des Associations Européennes de Football (UEFA); Applicant to Be Joined as Claimant: British Sky Broadcasting Limited (Sky); Applicant to Be Joined as Claimant: Setanta Sports S.a.r.l.; Applicant to Be Joined as Claimant: Group Canal Plus SA (GCP); Applicant to Be Joined as Claimant: Motion Picture Association (MPA)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Join Parties in Ongoing Intellectual Property Proceedings / Ruling on Applications to Be Joined as Claimants for the Purpose of ECJ Reference
- Outcome
- Applications granted, subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- Joinder of Parties, Preliminary Reference Procedure, Broadcasting Rights, Copyright, Competition Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Football Association Premier League Limited and Others
Claimants
QC Leisure (A Trading Name) and Others
Defendants
Union des Associations Européennes de Football (UEFA)
Applicant to Be Joined as Claimant
British Sky Broadcasting Limited (Sky)
Applicant to Be Joined as Claimant
Setanta Sports S.a.r.l.
Applicant to Be Joined as Claimant
Group Canal Plus SA (GCP)
Applicant to Be Joined as Claimant
Motion Picture Association (MPA)
Applicant to Be Joined as Claimant
Procedural Posture
Application to Join Parties in Ongoing Intellectual Property Proceedings / Ruling on Applications to Be Joined as Claimants for the Purpose of ECJ Reference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicants should be joined as claimants solely to participate in ECJ reference
- 2 Whether national law allows such joinder under CPR 19.2(2)
- 3 Whether joinder would unfairly prejudice defendants or burden the ECJ
Ratio Decidendi
It is desirable to join each applicant as a claimant under CPR 19.2(2)(a) because their participation will assist the court in resolving fundamental law and policy questions in the ECJ reference; any procedural disadvantages to the defendants can be mitigated by conditions on advance notice and oral submissions, and the additional burden or delay is justified by the importance of the issues.
Court Disposition
Applications granted, subject to conditions.
Orders
- Applicants (UEFA, Sky, Setanta, GCP, MPA) joined as claimants for the purpose of making submissions to the ECJ reference only.
- Applicants must provide defendants 28 days advance notice of any written observations to the ECJ.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment