Nathan v Smilovitch & Anor [2002] EWCA Civ 332 (1 March 2002)
There is a real prospect of success on appeal because the judge's findings were based on inferences from surrounding circumstances, and the applicant's arguments regarding the profit-sharing arrangements and lack of investment by AN merit consideration by the appellate court.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 332
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Aharon Nathan; First Defendant/applicant: Zvi Smilovitch; Second Defendant: Queenscroft Investments Inc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 March 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Joint Venture, Appeal Permission, Findings of Fact, Profit Sharing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aharon Nathan
Claimant/respondent
Zvi Smilovitch
First Defendant/applicant
Queenscroft Investments Inc
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the properties in question formed part of the joint venture between the parties
- 2 Whether the judge's findings of fact regarding the joint venture and profit sharing arrangements were correct
Ratio Decidendi
There is a real prospect of success on appeal because the judge's findings were based on inferences from surrounding circumstances, and the applicant's arguments regarding the profit-sharing arrangements and lack of investment by AN merit consideration by the appellate court.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal granted
- Costs of the application to be costs in the appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment