Donovan & Anor v Grainmarket Asset Management LLP

Donovan & Anor v Grainmarket Asset Management LLP

The right to a share of performance fees under the joint venture agreement was not conditional on substantial performance of obligations by Mr Donovan. There was no repudiation or renunciation by Mr Donovan, and the joint venture agreement was not terminated by accepted repudiation. Therefore, Mr Donovan and Naled Limited were entitled to their shares of performance fees and the benefit of the fee exemption agreement. Interest under the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998 was properly awarded.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: Daniel Donovan; Claimant/respondent: Naled Limited; Defendant/appellant: Grainmarket Asset Management LLP
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 May 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (london Circuit Commercial Court) to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Joint Venture Agreements, Repudiation, Conditionality of Payment, Quantum Meruit, Interest on Commercial Debts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Daniel Donovan

Claimant/respondent

Naled Limited

Claimant/respondent

Grainmarket Asset Management LLP

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (london Circuit Commercial Court) to Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether Mr Donovan's right to performance fees was conditional on performance of his obligations under the joint venture agreement
  2. 2 Whether Mr Donovan repudiated the joint venture agreement
  3. 3 Whether the joint venture agreement was terminated by repudiation or consensual agreement

Ratio Decidendi

The right to a share of performance fees under the joint venture agreement was not conditional on substantial performance of obligations by Mr Donovan. There was no repudiation or renunciation by Mr Donovan, and the joint venture agreement was not terminated by accepted repudiation. Therefore, Mr Donovan and Naled Limited were entitled to their shares of performance fees and the benefit of the fee exemption agreement. Interest under the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998 was properly awarded.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The Defendant’s appeal is dismissed
  • The Defendant to pay the Claimants’ costs of the appeal, to be assessed if not agreed