Chelsea Building Society v Nash
The claimant failed to prove that it expressly or impliedly reserved its rights to pursue Ms Nash after settling with Mr Upton. In the absence of such reservation, the general rule applies and Ms Nash is released from liability. The burden was on the claimant to establish reservation, which it did not meet.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Chelsea Building Society; Defendant/appellant: Lorraine Patricia Nash
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment of Hastings County Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Joint and Several Liability, Accord and Satisfaction, Mortgage Debt, Release of Co Debtors
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chelsea Building Society
Claimant/respondent
Lorraine Patricia Nash
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment of Hastings County Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a 'full and final settlement' with one joint mortgagor (Ms Nash's former husband) released the other joint mortgagor (Ms Nash) from liability under the legal charge.
- 2 Whether the claimant reserved its rights to pursue Ms Nash after settling with Mr Upton.
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant failed to prove that it expressly or impliedly reserved its rights to pursue Ms Nash after settling with Mr Upton. In the absence of such reservation, the general rule applies and Ms Nash is released from liability. The burden was on the claimant to establish reservation, which it did not meet.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment against Ms Nash set aside
- No express reservation of rights by claimant; Ms Nash released from liability
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment