Co-Operative Retail Services Ltd v Taylor Young Partnership & Ors [2000] EWCA Civ 207 (4 July 2000)
Wimpey and Hall are not liable to make contribution to TYP and HLP because, under the joint names insurance policy and the contractual arrangements, they are not persons liable in respect of the same damage within the meaning of the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978. Any claim by the insurers in CRS's name against Wimpey or Hall would be barred by circuity of action and/or an implied term of the insurance contract precluding subrogated claims between co-insureds.
- Citation
- [2000] EWCA Civ 207
- Parties
- Claimant: Co-operative Retail Services Ltd; Defendant/appellant: Taylor Young Partnership Ltd; Defendant/appellant: Hoare Lea and Partners; Third Party/respondent: Wimpey; Third Party/respondent: Hall
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From Preliminary Issue Judgment in Technology and Construction Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Joint Names Insurance, Contribution Claims, Subrogation, Contractual Interpretation, Negligence, Breach of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Co-operative Retail Services Ltd
Claimant
Taylor Young Partnership Ltd
Defendant/appellant
Hoare Lea and Partners
Defendant/appellant
Wimpey
Third Party/respondent
Hall
Third Party/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Preliminary Issue Judgment in Technology and Construction Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether main contractor (Wimpey) and electrical sub-contractor (Hall) are liable to make contribution to architects (TYP) and engineers (HLP) under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 for losses arising from a fire during construction, given the existence of joint names insurance and contractual arrangements.
Ratio Decidendi
Wimpey and Hall are not liable to make contribution to TYP and HLP because, under the joint names insurance policy and the contractual arrangements, they are not persons liable in respect of the same damage within the meaning of the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978. Any claim by the insurers in CRS's name against Wimpey or Hall would be barred by circuity of action and/or an implied term of the insurance contract precluding subrogated claims between co-insureds.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Wimpey and Hall are not liable to make contribution to TYP and HLP for any of the claimed losses.
- Permission to amend defence to allege contributory negligence refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment