Gulf International Bank v Al Ittefaq Steel Products Co & Ors [2010] EWHC 2601 (QB) (20 September 2010)
The court will only exceptionally extend time for payment of judgment debts under CPR 14.10 and 40.11, and only where the debtor is solvent and for short periods. Inability to pay and the interests of third party creditors or ongoing restructuring negotiations do not justify an extension in this case. The Defendants must take the consequences of their insolvency under the relevant legal regime.
- Citation
- [2010] EWHC 2601
- Parties
- Applicant/claimant: Gulf International Bank; Respondent/defendant: Al Ittefaq Steel Products Co; Respondent/defendant: Dr Hilal Al-Tuwairqi; Respondent/defendant: Al Tuwairqi Holding Company
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 September 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (commercial Debt Recovery) / Judgment on Admissions and Applications for Extension of Time to Pay
- Outcome
- Claimant's applications for judgment granted; Defendants' applications for extension of time refused.
- Legal Topics
- Judgment on Admissions, Extension of Time to Pay, Enforcement of Judgments, Insolvency, Restructuring Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gulf International Bank
Applicant/claimant
Al Ittefaq Steel Products Co
Respondent/defendant
Dr Hilal Al-Tuwairqi
Respondent/defendant
Al Tuwairqi Holding Company
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (commercial Debt Recovery) / Judgment on Admissions and Applications for Extension of Time to Pay
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should grant an extension of time to pay admitted judgment debts under CPR 14.10 and 40.11
- 2 Whether the interests of third party creditors or ongoing restructuring negotiations justify an extension of time
Ratio Decidendi
The court will only exceptionally extend time for payment of judgment debts under CPR 14.10 and 40.11, and only where the debtor is solvent and for short periods. Inability to pay and the interests of third party creditors or ongoing restructuring negotiations do not justify an extension in this case. The Defendants must take the consequences of their insolvency under the relevant legal regime.
Court Disposition
Claimant's applications for judgment granted; Defendants' applications for extension of time refused.
Orders
- Judgment for the Claimant for US$16,176,905.28 and SAR32,000,000 in the ISPC claim.
- Judgment for the Claimant for US$100,000,000 and US$2,248,170 in the ATHC claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment