Archer, R (on the application of) v Employment Tribunal & Ors [2001] EWCA Civ 2022 (11 December 2001)

Archer, R (on the application of) v Employment Tribunal & Ors [2001] EWCA Civ 2022 (11 December 2001)

The judge's decision was not based on the undisclosed documents; the applicant had opportunity to consider them and chose not to pursue further submissions. No prejudice occurred and no further order was required.

Citation
[2001] EWCA Civ 2022
Parties
Claimant/appellant: June Maureen Archer; Defendant/respondent: The Employment Tribunal; Interested Party: London Cab Drivers Club Limited; Interested Party: DAS Legal Expenses Insurance Company Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 December 2001
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (out of Time)
Outcome
No further order required; application not pursued.
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Appeal Procedure, Disclosure of Documents

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

June Maureen Archer

Claimant/appellant

The Employment Tribunal

Defendant/respondent

London Cab Drivers Club Limited

Interested Party

DAS Legal Expenses Insurance Company Limited

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (out of Time)

  1. 1 Whether the judge's decision was prejudiced by receipt of documents from an interested party not disclosed to the applicant
  2. 2 Whether further submissions were required based on the disclosed documents

Ratio Decidendi

The judge's decision was not based on the undisclosed documents; the applicant had opportunity to consider them and chose not to pursue further submissions. No prejudice occurred and no further order was required.

Court Disposition

No further order required; application not pursued.