Manu, R (on the application of) v Secretary Of State For Home Department [2001] EWCA Civ 1900 (7 December 2001)

Application for permission to appeal refused due to excessive and insufficiently explained delay; no merit found in substance of the case.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2001] EWCA Civ 1900
Parties: Claimant/applicant: Othene Manu; Defendant/respondent: The Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 07 December 2001
Procedural Posture: Application for Permission to Appeal / Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Outcome: Application for permission to appeal refused
Legal Topics: Judicial Review, Delay in Proceedings, Permission to Appeal

Administrative Law Immigration Law Judicial Review Delay in Proceedings Permission to Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Othene Manu

Claimant/applicant

The Secretary of State for the Home Department

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Permission to Appeal / Court of Appeal, Civil Division

Legal Issues

1 Whether permission to appeal should be granted in light of significant delay
2 Whether the explanation for delay is sufficient to justify judicial review

Ratio Decidendi

Application for permission to appeal refused due to excessive and insufficiently explained delay; no merit found in substance of the case.

Court Disposition

Application for permission to appeal refused

Orders

Application for permission to appeal refused

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.