Kaikai, R (on the application of) v Immigration Services Commissioner [2003] EWCA Civ 860 (11 June 2003)
The application for judicial review was refused because the applicant had an alternative remedy by way of appeal to the Immigration Services Tribunal, and there was no error of law or denial of natural justice in the tribunal's refusal to suspend the Commissioner's decision.
- Citation
- [2003] EWCA Civ 860
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Kaikai; Defendant/respondent: Immigration Services Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 June 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Permission to Appeal (judicial Review) / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal Refusal of Permission for Judicial Review, Stay of Execution, and Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Alternative Remedy, Suspension of Decision, Natural Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kaikai
Claimant/appellant
Immigration Services Commissioner
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Permission to Appeal (judicial Review) / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal Refusal of Permission for Judicial Review, Stay of Execution, and Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the refusal to suspend the Commissioner's decision was unlawful
- 2 Whether the applicant was denied natural justice
- 3 Whether judicial review is available where an alternative remedy exists
Ratio Decidendi
The application for judicial review was refused because the applicant had an alternative remedy by way of appeal to the Immigration Services Tribunal, and there was no error of law or denial of natural justice in the tribunal's refusal to suspend the Commissioner's decision.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment