Tataw, R (on the application of) v Immigration Appeal Tribunal [2003] EWCA Civ 925 (18 June 2003)
A procedural error resulted in the applicant's appeal being dismissed without consideration of the merits. The court has jurisdiction to quash the tribunal's decision and remit the matter for reconsideration, as justice requires the applicant's substantive case to be heard.
- Citation
- [2003] EWCA Civ 925
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Manyi Tataw; Defendant/respondent: Immigration Appeal Tribunal; Interested Party: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (asylum) / Appeal From Refusal of Permission to Seek Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Asylum Procedure, Procedural Fairness, Natural Justice, Female Genital Mutilation, Article 3 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Manyi Tataw
Claimant/appellant
Immigration Appeal Tribunal
Defendant/respondent
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (asylum) / Appeal From Refusal of Permission to Seek Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to quash the Immigration Appeal Tribunal's refusal of permission to appeal due to a procedural error not attributable to the applicant or the tribunal
- 2 Whether the High Court was correct to address the merits of the asylum claim rather than remit the matter to the tribunal
Ratio Decidendi
A procedural error resulted in the applicant's appeal being dismissed without consideration of the merits. The court has jurisdiction to quash the tribunal's decision and remit the matter for reconsideration, as justice requires the applicant's substantive case to be heard.
Court Disposition
Application allowed
Orders
- Decision of the Immigration Appeal Tribunal set aside
- Matter remitted for further consideration by the Immigration Appeal Tribunal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment