Tataw, R (on the application of) v Immigration Appeal Tribunal [2003] EWCA Civ 925 (18 June 2003)

Tataw, R (on the application of) v Immigration Appeal Tribunal [2003] EWCA Civ 925 (18 June 2003)

A procedural error resulted in the applicant's appeal being dismissed without consideration of the merits. The court has jurisdiction to quash the tribunal's decision and remit the matter for reconsideration, as justice requires the applicant's substantive case to be heard.

Citation
[2003] EWCA Civ 925
Parties
Claimant/appellant: Manyi Tataw; Defendant/respondent: Immigration Appeal Tribunal; Interested Party: Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 June 2003
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (asylum) / Appeal From Refusal of Permission to Seek Judicial Review
Outcome
Application allowed
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Asylum Procedure, Procedural Fairness, Natural Justice, Female Genital Mutilation, Article 3 ECHR

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Manyi Tataw

Claimant/appellant

Immigration Appeal Tribunal

Defendant/respondent

Secretary of State for the Home Department

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review (asylum) / Appeal From Refusal of Permission to Seek Judicial Review

  1. 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to quash the Immigration Appeal Tribunal's refusal of permission to appeal due to a procedural error not attributable to the applicant or the tribunal
  2. 2 Whether the High Court was correct to address the merits of the asylum claim rather than remit the matter to the tribunal

Ratio Decidendi

A procedural error resulted in the applicant's appeal being dismissed without consideration of the merits. The court has jurisdiction to quash the tribunal's decision and remit the matter for reconsideration, as justice requires the applicant's substantive case to be heard.

Court Disposition

Application allowed

Orders

  • Decision of the Immigration Appeal Tribunal set aside
  • Matter remitted for further consideration by the Immigration Appeal Tribunal