Bernard v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council [2003] EWHC 147 (Admin) (30 January 2003)

Bernard v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council [2003] EWHC 147 (Admin) (30 January 2003)

The prosecuting authority's unreasonable refusal to provide particulars necessitated the judicial review application; had the matter proceeded, the claimant would have succeeded. The authority's conduct justified an order for indemnity costs.

Citation
[2003] EWHC 147 (Admin)
Parties
Claimant: Dilisser Roy Bernard; First Defendant: Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council; Second Defendant: Dudley Magistrates' Court
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 January 2003
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Costs Determination After Substantive Proceedings Rendered Academic
Outcome
Costs awarded to claimant on indemnity basis
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Costs, Health and Safety at Work, Particulars of Offence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dilisser Roy Bernard

Claimant

Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council

First Defendant

Dudley Magistrates' Court

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Costs Determination After Substantive Proceedings Rendered Academic

  1. 1 Whether the prosecuting authority was obliged to provide further particulars of the offences
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to costs after the substantive issue became academic due to provision of particulars

Ratio Decidendi

The prosecuting authority's unreasonable refusal to provide particulars necessitated the judicial review application; had the matter proceeded, the claimant would have succeeded. The authority's conduct justified an order for indemnity costs.

Court Disposition

Costs awarded to claimant on indemnity basis

Orders

  • The first defendant shall pay the costs of the judicial review proceedings and the costs of today's proceedings on the indemnity basis.
  • Costs to be subject to detailed assessment by a costs judge.