Rama, R (on the application of) v Immigration Appeal Tribunal & Anor [2004] EWCA Civ 353 (15 March 2004)

Rama, R (on the application of) v Immigration Appeal Tribunal & Anor [2004] EWCA Civ 353 (15 March 2004)

No point of law was identified to justify permission to appeal; the application was vague and without merit, and procedural non-compliance further justified refusal.

Citation
[2004] EWCA Civ 353
Parties
Claimant/appellant: Puja Rama; Defendant/respondent: Immigration Appeal Tribunal; Interested Party: Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 March 2004
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Application for reinstatement of permission to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Permission to Appeal, Immigration Appeals
Immigration Law Administrative Law Judicial Review Permission to Appeal Immigration Appeals

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Puja Rama

Claimant/appellant

Immigration Appeal Tribunal

Defendant/respondent

Secretary of State for the Home Department

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there is a point of law justifying permission to appeal the Immigration Appeal Tribunal's decision
  2. 2 Whether the application for reinstatement should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

No point of law was identified to justify permission to appeal; the application was vague and without merit, and procedural non-compliance further justified refusal.

Court Disposition

Application for reinstatement of permission to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Application to reinstate the application for permission to appeal refused.