Gerber, R (on the application of) v Wiltshire Council & Ors [2016] EWCA Civ 84 (23 February 2016)
The Council's SCI did not create a legitimate expectation of direct notification to Mr Gerber as a non-adjoining owner. The Council complied with statutory notification requirements. Mr Gerber's delay in bringing judicial review was not justified, and reliance on legal advice did not excuse the delay. The judge erred in extending time and in granting relief. The balance of prejudice, financial hardship to the developers, and the need for certainty in planning decisions required refusal of relief and upholding the planning permission.
- Citation
- [2016] EWCA Civ 84
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Daniel Gerber; Defendant/1st Appellant: Wiltshire Council; Interested Party/2nd Appellant: Terraform Power Inc; Interested Party/2nd Appellant: Norrington Solar Farm Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (planning) / Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; High Court's extension of time and quashing order set aside; planning permission upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Legitimate Expectation, Delay and Extension of Time, Planning Permission, Listed Buildings, Environmental Impact Assessment, Remedies and Discretion, Good Administration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daniel Gerber
Claimant/respondent
Wiltshire Council
Defendant/1st Appellant
Terraform Power Inc
Interested Party/2nd Appellant
Norrington Solar Farm Limited
Interested Party/2nd Appellant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (planning) / Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Council created a legitimate expectation of direct notification to Mr Gerber under its Statement of Community Involvement (SCI)
- 2 Whether the High Court judge erred in extending time for judicial review under CPR Part 54.5
- 3 Whether the judge erred in granting relief (quashing planning permission) under section 31(6) of the Senior Courts Act 1981 despite delay and prejudice to third parties
Ratio Decidendi
The Council's SCI did not create a legitimate expectation of direct notification to Mr Gerber as a non-adjoining owner. The Council complied with statutory notification requirements. Mr Gerber's delay in bringing judicial review was not justified, and reliance on legal advice did not excuse the delay. The judge erred in extending time and in granting relief. The balance of prejudice, financial hardship to the developers, and the need for certainty in planning decisions required refusal of relief and upholding the planning permission.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; High Court's extension of time and quashing order set aside; planning permission upheld.
Orders
- Set aside the extension of time for judicial review under CPR Part 54.5.
- Set aside the order quashing the planning permission.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment