Corbiere Ltd & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary Of State For Justice & Ors [2017] EWHC 3364 (Admin) (20 December 2017)
The Secretary of State for Justice was not required to recall Mr Xu as the breaches relied upon pre-dated the licence and his conduct during trial did not make recall necessary or rationally required. The Claimants were not entitled to disclosure of licence conditions as they were not statutory or discretionary victims. The Secretary of State for the Home Department's decision to deport Mr Xu before expiry of his licence and conclusion of civil proceedings was lawful, proportionate, and within her statutory discretion; the public interest in deportation outweighed the speculative and unquantifiable risk of harm to the Claimants. There was no legal basis to require withholding Mr Xu's...
- Citation
- [2017] EWHC 3364 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Corbiere Limited; Claimant: Trenchant Limited; Claimant: Trenchant Employee Services Limited; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Justice; Second Defendant: Secretary of State for the Home Department; Interested Party: Ke Xu
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Rolled Up Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Deportation, Licence Conditions, Serious Crime Prevention Order, Victim Rights, Disclosure, Breach of Confidence, Intellectual Property, Confiscation Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Corbiere Limited
Claimant
Trenchant Limited
Claimant
Trenchant Employee Services Limited
Claimant
Secretary of State for Justice
First Defendant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Second Defendant
Ke Xu
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Rolled Up Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Secretary of State for Justice acted unlawfully in not recalling Mr Xu to prison under his licence
- 2 Whether the Secretary of State for Justice was required to disclose licence conditions to the Claimants
- 3 Whether the Secretary of State for the Home Department's decision to deport Mr Xu before expiry of his licence and conclusion of civil proceedings was unlawful
Ratio Decidendi
The Secretary of State for Justice was not required to recall Mr Xu as the breaches relied upon pre-dated the licence and his conduct during trial did not make recall necessary or rationally required. The Claimants were not entitled to disclosure of licence conditions as they were not statutory or discretionary victims. The Secretary of State for the Home Department's decision to deport Mr Xu before expiry of his licence and conclusion of civil proceedings was lawful, proportionate, and within her statutory discretion; the public interest in deportation outweighed the speculative and unquantifiable risk of harm to the Claimants. There was no legal basis to require withholding Mr Xu's...
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- All claims for judicial review are refused
- No relief granted to the Claimants
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment