Bulled, R (on the application of) v Parking and Traffic Appeals Service

Bulled, R (on the application of) v Parking and Traffic Appeals Service

The adjudicator's decision was a finding of fact, not subject to judicial review, and there was no arguable error of law or procedural unfairness. The applicant failed to provide evidence of having purchased a ticket, and the process was fair.

Parties
Claimant/appellant: Mr Bulled; Defendant/respondent: Parking and Traffic Appeals Service
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 November 2006
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application for Permission to Appeal Refusal of Judicial Review
Outcome
Application for permission to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Parking Regulations, Disability Rights
Administrative Law Traffic Law Judicial Review Parking Regulations Disability Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Bulled

Claimant/appellant

Parking and Traffic Appeals Service

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Application for Permission to Appeal Refusal of Judicial Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the adjudicator's decision regarding the parking penalty was amenable to judicial review
  2. 2 Whether the applicant was denied procedural fairness in the appeals process
  3. 3 Whether the evidence was properly considered by the adjudicator

Ratio Decidendi

The adjudicator's decision was a finding of fact, not subject to judicial review, and there was no arguable error of law or procedural unfairness. The applicant failed to provide evidence of having purchased a ticket, and the process was fair.

Court Disposition

Application for permission to appeal refused

Orders

  • Application refused