(D and B), R (on the application of) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis & Ors
The decisions of the police and CPS to prosecute were not irrational or unlawful, no legitimate expectation arose from the CPS advocate's statements, and the justices' refusal to stay the prosecution was reasonable and supported by the evidence.
- Parties
- Claimant: D; Claimant: B; First Defendant: Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis; Second Defendant: Crown Prosecution Service; Third Defendant: Croydon Justices
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for judicial review dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Abuse of Process, Legitimate Expectation, Youth Offending, Prosecution Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
D
Claimant
B
Claimant
Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
First Defendant
Crown Prosecution Service
Second Defendant
Croydon Justices
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the police and CPS decisions to prosecute rather than issue final warnings were lawful
- 2 Whether a legitimate expectation arose that the claimants would receive final warnings
- 3 Whether the Croydon Justices erred in refusing to stay the prosecution as an abuse of process
Ratio Decidendi
The decisions of the police and CPS to prosecute were not irrational or unlawful, no legitimate expectation arose from the CPS advocate's statements, and the justices' refusal to stay the prosecution was reasonable and supported by the evidence.
Court Disposition
Application for judicial review dismissed
Orders
- Stay on proceedings in Croydon Youth Court lifted
- No order as to costs against claimants due to age and means
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment