Bokhari, R (on the application of) v First Secretary of State & Anor [2005] EWHC 913 (Admin) (26 April 2005)
There was no arguable error of law in the inspector's decision; all grounds of challenge failed as the inspector acted within his discretion and applied relevant planning policies correctly.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] EWHC 913 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Bokhari; First Defendant: First Secretary of State; Second Defendant: Council of the London Borough of Newham
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Under Section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Planning Permission, Development Plan Policies, Costs
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bokhari
Claimant
First Secretary of State
First Defendant
Council of the London Borough of Newham
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Under Section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the inspector's decision to dismiss the planning appeal was unlawful
- 2 Whether the inspector failed to conduct a proper site visit
- 3 Whether the inspector failed to consider wider community benefit
Ratio Decidendi
There was no arguable error of law in the inspector's decision; all grounds of challenge failed as the inspector acted within his discretion and applied relevant planning policies correctly.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Claimant to pay First Defendant's costs
- Costs summarily assessed at £3,197
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment