Winter v First Secretary of State & Anor
The Inspector did not err in law; she considered all material matters, gave adequate reasons, and exercised her discretion properly regarding the site visit. No substantial prejudice or legal error was established.
- Parties
- Claimant: Martin Paul Winter; 1st Defendant: First Secretary of State; 2nd Defendant: Wealden District Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (planning) / Judgment on Application to Quash Planning Decision
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review of Planning Decisions, Tree Preservation Orders, Ancient Woodland Protection, Adequacy of Reasons, Procedural Fairness in Planning Appeals
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martin Paul Winter
Claimant
First Secretary of State
1st Defendant
Wealden District Council
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (planning) / Judgment on Application to Quash Planning Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Planning Inspector failed to take into account material considerations
- 2 Whether the Inspector gave adequate reasons for her decision
- 3 Whether the Inspector erred in conducting an unaccompanied site visit
Ratio Decidendi
The Inspector did not err in law; she considered all material matters, gave adequate reasons, and exercised her discretion properly regarding the site visit. No substantial prejudice or legal error was established.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Claimant's application to quash the Inspector's decision is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment