Benn, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor
The Inspector did not err in law in concluding, on the limited financial evidence before him, that the business was not shown to be unviable. The High Court cannot consider new evidence not before the Inspector in a section 288 challenge.
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr Benn; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Defendant: Hambleton District Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990) / Judgment After Substantive Hearing
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review of Planning Decisions, Financial Viability in Planning Applications, Error of Law by Planning Inspector
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Benn
Claimant
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
First Defendant
Hambleton District Council
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990) / Judgment After Substantive Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Inspector erred in law in finding insufficient evidence of financial non-viability to justify change of use
- 2 Whether the High Court can consider new evidence not before the Inspector in a section 288 challenge
Ratio Decidendi
The Inspector did not err in law in concluding, on the limited financial evidence before him, that the business was not shown to be unviable. The High Court cannot consider new evidence not before the Inspector in a section 288 challenge.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application under section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 dismissed
- Claimant to pay First Defendant's costs summarily assessed at £2,348
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment